Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Quicktime Episodes Stream

New Orleans


Original title: The Bad Lieutenant: Port of call - New Orleans (USA, 2009) / Address: Werner Herzog / Cast: Nicolas Cage, Eva Mendes, Val Kilmer, Fairuza Balk, Xzibit, Brad Dourif, Jennifer Coolidge, Michael Shannon / Duration: 122 minutes

" What difficult for me," said Alejandro Lerner . And I, too difficult, but not load the luggage, but put up with Nicolas Cage . Actor prone to exaggeration and to act in films farts, but it has an undeniable intensity and, if well managed, the ability to create different characters. And this is the case Bad Lieutenant: Port of call - New Orlean s, film in which the typical pose exacerbated Cage has a legitimate reason for being.
Terence McDonagh is a New Orleans cop who lives on the edge. While his police career is on the rise, his personal life is quite violent. Addicted to cocaine (or any drug that falls into their hands), an inveterate gambler, with a back injury that causes chronic pain, "boyfriend" with a prostitute with powerful clients, the son of an alcoholic father, and several etceteras more ... One day McDonagh received the case of a Senegalese immigrant family murdered in their home, which will lead him to investigate a local drug dealer would be the alleged murderer. But the truth is that the research itself is not the most important film, but everything that happens around the life of the police.

For those who believe that this is kind of a remake or continuation of Bad lieutenant of Abel Ferrara with Harvey Keitel , I said no. The only common point between the two films (besides the title) is that its protagonist is an addict and corrupt police. But while that was a dark drama, full of guilt, this is more bizarre, with an elaborate sense of humor and lack of heavy redemption attempt by its central character. With the same title because both films are from the same producers, and wanted to take advantage of this. But it is a pity, in my opinion, as it removes some entity in this film that has its merits in its own right.
The story begins in New Orleans post Katrina. A devastated city, almost in ruins. And although the film does so much emphasis on the situation of the city, it uses this depressing scenario as background for his story. McDonagh , like the city is quite undone. Tolerating a back injury that forced him to take painkillers for life, and makes you walk lightly twisted, first undertake an almost personal with the investigation, until the chaotic circumstances of his private life be shifting their way all the time.

I should clarify that Bad lieutenant is a very strange film, with a very personal style. Its director is Werner Herzog almost legendary German filmmaker recognized, among other things, for his films with Klaus Kinski , actor who was much more crazy than Cage. The movie, which could be defined as a crime drama, at times becomes a very dark comedy, and that requires a particular sense of humor to be enjoyed. Especially funny are the ways in which Cage is made of all the drugs that pass before his eyes. So, although the story is depressing and sordid, the film never makes us feel sad with what is seen. But this is not true for a cool humor to Tarantino. In that sense it is more bizarre. And in fact has a couple of scenes that can be simply described as "bizarre" as the footage of the iguanas ...
I think that the enjoyment of the movie is going to spend much tolerance one has of Cage, who appears almost all the time. As I said, is an actor who bear little, but in this case its performance style matches the tone of the film. And if While there are moments where it goes a little mambo, his performance is intense and, as I said, fun. But beware, you have to bank ... It is also good input from Eva Mendes and his girlfriend, plus the colorful cast.

Bad lieutenant is a rare film, at times bewildering, but always interesting. And that is a reminder that Nicolas Cage , under the right circumstances, can yield much. He had already shown in Leaving Las Vegas (1995) and Adaptation (2002). Is it only seven years ago type stuff? We'll see what it does in 2016. Meanwhile, surely make 4 or 5 movies with Michael Bay . He, like the character, also has to pay several debts, it seems.

Bad Lieutenant New Orleans opens in Argentina on Thursday 4 marz0.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Clairol Complements Color Conversion

At the edge of the dark land of zombies


Original title: Edge of Darkness (USA / UK, 2010) / Address: Martin Campbell / Cast: Mel Gibson, Ray Winstone, Danny Huston, Bojana Novakovic / Duration: 117 minutes

seems incredible, but for eight years Mel Gibson starred in a film not (Signs , 2002). Since then, he directed two films and was involved in some scandals changed the perception the public had of him. Ceased to be one of the world's most beloved stars to become a controversial film director but valuable, whose personal problems and unfortunate ideological expressions tarnished his artwork. But they say time heals all wounds, and Mel decided it was time to return to the screen. If indeed it was, I dunno. From what I am pretty sure that the film is chosen for his return was not the happiest. Not for its subject, but by its quality.
Edge of Darkness In Gibson is Thomas Craven, a veteran police officer who receives a visit from his only daughter, 24, who lives in another city. But within hours of arrival, she is brutally murdered on the doorstep of his father. What follows is research starting Craven to find those responsible for the crime and to discover the hidden motives behind the murder.

To begin, I want to get our hopes on those who expect a revenge movie violent and frantic action in the wake of relentless search . At that, Liam Neeson played a former special agent whose daughter was kidnapped in France by traffickers. And the guy was using all methods and resources, mostly involving violence, to find it. This is different. Gibson's character is someone with an undeniable thirst for revenge, but such an investigation of police, following leads and interviewing self to those close to her daughter. While there are a few action scenes, the film goes on the side of drama, intrigue, and the complaint (the company he worked for the girl is engaged to nuclear research and has dubious connections with the government). Of course, the film goes on that side there would be nothing wrong if it were not almost never really got interested. In this sense, the "faults" are shared by the script, direction and the protagonist.
The film is based on an award-winning British TV miniseries of the 80's. I saw that series, also directed by Martin Campbell , but I imagine it was much better than the movie. Here, Campbell (responsible for the excellent Casino Royale ) fails to generate a very strong link between Craven and her daughter as we engage with the story from the beginning. A ten-minute film the girl is already dead, and what follows does little to interest us. The Gibson resource imaginary exchanges taking his daughter, especially small, with me at least it did not work. And the story about the causes of murder intrigued me.

protagonist does not help. Returning to the comparison with relentless search (which also is not a film that has enchanted me), there was the main Liam Neeson, an excellent actor who adds depth and credibility to their characters. Gibson, however, is less ductile. And in this case particular action seemed looser than ever. It is a perception of me, but fails to convey much of anything. And that we're talking about a character who lost her only child, so that there is enough to transmit. Another thing strange: I do not know if it was the copy I saw the movie (it was a role for the press, so it was of good quality) but the voice of Mel sounded very nasal. Is it on purpose for the character? Will the years? Will Mel herr old man? What was I ... As I said, weird.
The film has some moments when lifting, but they are few. These moments are those that appear Ray Winstone , That great British actor who here makes Jedburgh , a security specialist working for the U.S. government, whose task is to "clean up" dirty dishes and tie up loose ends. And that gives a special relationship with Craven . In scenes that appear Winstone, which unfortunately not many, the quality of the film increases. Even Gibson performance improvement your side ... Another good actor, wasted, is Danny Huston, who plays the boss of the company. A typical corporate evil.

Anyway, nothing new under the sun. Vindictive parent, I recommend seeing The Limey , very good film with Steven Soderbergh Terence Stamp. As Gibson I think it has proven to be a very interesting director. And I also believe that much of the public has no desire to see a lot of face. And the charm it once had is not working well. Perhaps in the coming years, Gibson recognize this situation and focus on what you do best. Behind the scenes. And far from the microphones.

The Edge of Darkness opens in Argentina on 25 February.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Wanted Woman With Boat




original Title: Zombieland (USA, 2009) / Address: Ruben Fleischer / Cast: Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin / Duration: 88 minutes
admit

in recent years I have become quite adept at the stories of zombies. Do not really know why. Maybe I should talk to my analyst ... The truth is that the film will continue to encounter twists to this subgenre. And that makes me happy. Zombieland with its original approach and quirky sense of humor, is a clear example.
The protagonist of the story is Columbus ( Jesse Eisenberg), a timid young man who, thanks to its strict code of rules, can survive in a stinking world of zombies. One day he crosses paths Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson ) a tough guy, lonely, half reluctantly, accepted the company's young. Both then they will find a couple of girls (Emma Stone's rising and Little Miss Sunshine Abigail Breslin ) that are less innocent than they seem. In short, it forms the typical group of this kind of uneven films. Characters that first wary of each other, but then they get to know and estimating. What Following is the route that conducted to reach a safe course, free of mutants. Of course, on the road will be finding more problems.

As will be seen, there is nothing in history that seem very original. But what makes Zombieland an experience so entertaining is the way it is told. From the beginning the movie is different, with Columbus counting off his rules for survival in a world of zombies. Rules that emphasize some basic topics of this subgenus, but in a very original. The film is a horror comedy, but fear is the least cause. May not have the wit or subtlety of Shaun of the dead, but has a more savage humor (which is logical, it remains that English and U.S.). And he has a Woody Harrelson fully, making up one of those gross sympathetic out so well. And has a great cameo that, although already deschavaron in various media, I'd rather not reveal. It also has something I like zombie movies, and is not aimed at explaining the causes of what happens. We only know that the world is full of zombies. Point. And much less looking reflections and analogies with the real world, politics, society ... It's a film that plays with the genre, nothing more. Nothing less. Oh, and is short.

Zombieland not extraordinary, but it is good. A right mix of humor, guts and blood. And it seems that is already under way continued. So the fans continue to enjoy living stiffs. Long live the dead!

Monday, February 8, 2010

16 Year Old Linsey Dawn Mckenzie

Parents transmit values \u200b\u200bto their children. And the children, parents

A new bill has been presented ... join hands approving so soon!
I leave the link in the note to be read directly

http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/suplementos/las12/13-1524-2004-10-17.html

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Where I Can Get Liscence To Do Brazilian Wax

Living on the edge


Original title: The Hurt Locker (USA, 2009) / Address: Kathryn Bigelow / Cast: Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty, Guy Pearce, Ralph Fiennes, David Morse, Evangeline Lilly / Duration: 131 minutes

Ah, the difficult art of criticizing ... How do I explain to them that most acclaimed film of the year in USA (see here), which many experts say Americans as one of the best in the last decade, which has just been nominated for 9 Academy Awards has disappointed me? It's easy, really. This is cinema, and we all have reason to say when. The art really can not be quantified (for that I am thinking about giving up my beloved "Damiancito ). In most cases, the causes that lead to appreciate someone about a work are difficult to explain, because they relate to the emotional. Although there is often rational and ideological reasons that come into play. I think this is the case.
The Hurt Locker narrates the daily life of a U.S. army squad that specializes in off explosives. The film happens in Iraq, although the film does not deal with very specific reference to the conflict itself. The main character is Sergeant William James (Jeremy Renner ), a specialist who constantly risked that seems to defy common sense, and even the rules of the army, dictate. This makes two new friends (actually James joins the squad as a replacement for other specialist), seen with suspicion and as a possible threat. So go on moving from mission to mission, each more stressful than the last.

First of all, let me make it clear that the film did not seem "bad." On the contrary, I think it has high production values. The direction of Kathryn Bigelow is really stressful. Manages to put the viewer in the shoes of the soldiers in the midst of a hostile environment in which you never know who is friend and who foe. Many camera hand, very dizzy, much visual impact. Since this style of filming, is also praising the work of Renner, who manages an intense action-based attitudes, gestures and reactions in situations that make life or death decisions in seconds. In fact, the entire cast provides good jobs. And, of course, all technical aspects of the film (sound, editing, photography) are rare.
Now, let's get to that me (I emphasize this because I think it is important) I came up with the film. First, I had a hard time identifying with the protagonists. I understand that an American feel empathy with these soldiers who risk their lives thousands of miles from home. But I can not help but feel some reluctance towards these guys dressed in green pointing guns and shouting at any Iraqi civilian they deem suspicious. I understand the dangerous nature of the situation, but from the start I can not leave my perception of the facts. In addition, the character of James reaches the height of daring, and their attitudes have never ended for me a satisfactory explanation.

The film makes no judgments about the conflict (this is not inherently bad). In fact, it seems to be interested in a more general human nature, which means that sometimes perform actions that go beyond any logic. Hence, the film begins with the phrase "War is a drug." The purpose of the film is then put us in a world in which men act according to his need for adrenaline, and not its reasoning. This leaves no will be interesting, and the film really does justice to the adrenaline, but I could not help feeling emotionally away from this idea and the protagonist. Therefore, no matter how well intended it is the film or how well it is Renner in his role, I could not finish the story under my skin.
On the other hand, the script is structured through what is happening on different days. Thus, one could divide the plot in each of the situations that the protagonists must cross. All situations expertly executed, as I said. But it also helped me to dramatically film gave me a lot and was growing with the passage of minutes. To make matters worse, the only time the three men create a sort of personal relationship, make it totally drunk and behaving like the typical American soldier, playing to give blows. For someone who hates the doctrines (religious or military) this kind of behavior seem ridiculous, so there was no affinity for that side.

Anyway. Honestly, I put punctuation in the film because I have as usual, but some time ago which I have been rethinking this to give scores. I think it gives an anchor to the comment that perhaps is not quite illustrative. In this case, my review I wanted to make it clear the causes that led to that I could not enjoy this movie as their levels of achievement would merit. I have no doubt that many people will appreciate the adrenaline that the film conveys so well. And I think it's great that way. And take note that I am one of the first to defend this kind of film. But in this case, something happened to me. Something away. I hope you have been clear what it was, so that when they see the film is not ask "How the hell did not like Damien this awesome movie? "Simple. This is cinema, dear friends. And we are all right.

The Hurt Locker opens in Argentina on 4 February.