Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Wanted Woman With Boat




original Title: Zombieland (USA, 2009) / Address: Ruben Fleischer / Cast: Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin / Duration: 88 minutes
admit

in recent years I have become quite adept at the stories of zombies. Do not really know why. Maybe I should talk to my analyst ... The truth is that the film will continue to encounter twists to this subgenre. And that makes me happy. Zombieland with its original approach and quirky sense of humor, is a clear example.
The protagonist of the story is Columbus ( Jesse Eisenberg), a timid young man who, thanks to its strict code of rules, can survive in a stinking world of zombies. One day he crosses paths Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson ) a tough guy, lonely, half reluctantly, accepted the company's young. Both then they will find a couple of girls (Emma Stone's rising and Little Miss Sunshine Abigail Breslin ) that are less innocent than they seem. In short, it forms the typical group of this kind of uneven films. Characters that first wary of each other, but then they get to know and estimating. What Following is the route that conducted to reach a safe course, free of mutants. Of course, on the road will be finding more problems.

As will be seen, there is nothing in history that seem very original. But what makes Zombieland an experience so entertaining is the way it is told. From the beginning the movie is different, with Columbus counting off his rules for survival in a world of zombies. Rules that emphasize some basic topics of this subgenus, but in a very original. The film is a horror comedy, but fear is the least cause. May not have the wit or subtlety of Shaun of the dead, but has a more savage humor (which is logical, it remains that English and U.S.). And he has a Woody Harrelson fully, making up one of those gross sympathetic out so well. And has a great cameo that, although already deschavaron in various media, I'd rather not reveal. It also has something I like zombie movies, and is not aimed at explaining the causes of what happens. We only know that the world is full of zombies. Point. And much less looking reflections and analogies with the real world, politics, society ... It's a film that plays with the genre, nothing more. Nothing less. Oh, and is short.

Zombieland not extraordinary, but it is good. A right mix of humor, guts and blood. And it seems that is already under way continued. So the fans continue to enjoy living stiffs. Long live the dead!

Monday, February 8, 2010

16 Year Old Linsey Dawn Mckenzie

Parents transmit values \u200b\u200bto their children. And the children, parents

A new bill has been presented ... join hands approving so soon!
I leave the link in the note to be read directly

http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/suplementos/las12/13-1524-2004-10-17.html

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Where I Can Get Liscence To Do Brazilian Wax

Living on the edge


Original title: The Hurt Locker (USA, 2009) / Address: Kathryn Bigelow / Cast: Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty, Guy Pearce, Ralph Fiennes, David Morse, Evangeline Lilly / Duration: 131 minutes

Ah, the difficult art of criticizing ... How do I explain to them that most acclaimed film of the year in USA (see here), which many experts say Americans as one of the best in the last decade, which has just been nominated for 9 Academy Awards has disappointed me? It's easy, really. This is cinema, and we all have reason to say when. The art really can not be quantified (for that I am thinking about giving up my beloved "Damiancito ). In most cases, the causes that lead to appreciate someone about a work are difficult to explain, because they relate to the emotional. Although there is often rational and ideological reasons that come into play. I think this is the case.
The Hurt Locker narrates the daily life of a U.S. army squad that specializes in off explosives. The film happens in Iraq, although the film does not deal with very specific reference to the conflict itself. The main character is Sergeant William James (Jeremy Renner ), a specialist who constantly risked that seems to defy common sense, and even the rules of the army, dictate. This makes two new friends (actually James joins the squad as a replacement for other specialist), seen with suspicion and as a possible threat. So go on moving from mission to mission, each more stressful than the last.

First of all, let me make it clear that the film did not seem "bad." On the contrary, I think it has high production values. The direction of Kathryn Bigelow is really stressful. Manages to put the viewer in the shoes of the soldiers in the midst of a hostile environment in which you never know who is friend and who foe. Many camera hand, very dizzy, much visual impact. Since this style of filming, is also praising the work of Renner, who manages an intense action-based attitudes, gestures and reactions in situations that make life or death decisions in seconds. In fact, the entire cast provides good jobs. And, of course, all technical aspects of the film (sound, editing, photography) are rare.
Now, let's get to that me (I emphasize this because I think it is important) I came up with the film. First, I had a hard time identifying with the protagonists. I understand that an American feel empathy with these soldiers who risk their lives thousands of miles from home. But I can not help but feel some reluctance towards these guys dressed in green pointing guns and shouting at any Iraqi civilian they deem suspicious. I understand the dangerous nature of the situation, but from the start I can not leave my perception of the facts. In addition, the character of James reaches the height of daring, and their attitudes have never ended for me a satisfactory explanation.

The film makes no judgments about the conflict (this is not inherently bad). In fact, it seems to be interested in a more general human nature, which means that sometimes perform actions that go beyond any logic. Hence, the film begins with the phrase "War is a drug." The purpose of the film is then put us in a world in which men act according to his need for adrenaline, and not its reasoning. This leaves no will be interesting, and the film really does justice to the adrenaline, but I could not help feeling emotionally away from this idea and the protagonist. Therefore, no matter how well intended it is the film or how well it is Renner in his role, I could not finish the story under my skin.
On the other hand, the script is structured through what is happening on different days. Thus, one could divide the plot in each of the situations that the protagonists must cross. All situations expertly executed, as I said. But it also helped me to dramatically film gave me a lot and was growing with the passage of minutes. To make matters worse, the only time the three men create a sort of personal relationship, make it totally drunk and behaving like the typical American soldier, playing to give blows. For someone who hates the doctrines (religious or military) this kind of behavior seem ridiculous, so there was no affinity for that side.

Anyway. Honestly, I put punctuation in the film because I have as usual, but some time ago which I have been rethinking this to give scores. I think it gives an anchor to the comment that perhaps is not quite illustrative. In this case, my review I wanted to make it clear the causes that led to that I could not enjoy this movie as their levels of achievement would merit. I have no doubt that many people will appreciate the adrenaline that the film conveys so well. And I think it's great that way. And take note that I am one of the first to defend this kind of film. But in this case, something happened to me. Something away. I hope you have been clear what it was, so that when they see the film is not ask "How the hell did not like Damien this awesome movie? "Simple. This is cinema, dear friends. And we are all right.

The Hurt Locker opens in Argentina on 4 February.