The bitter debate on nuclear power threatens to reverberate unpredictably as a result of the disaster in Japan, which thrive on those who are against power to stir and turn their opposition, convinced that the time is appropriate to enforce their views. Respecting all views, how could it be otherwise in a democratic forum, however there is an alarm that only creates confusion and unintended clashes. And lack serenity. For example, I can not understand the panic transmitting the energy commissioner of the European Union are talking about apocalypse and cataclysm, that even if they were true, an authority should handle these terms with great tact and restraint, because it solves nothing to instil fear in the population. At that the Japanese themselves with much more calm, perhaps for reasons of character and responsibility.
is true that there are alternative energy, but nuclear is necessary today even just thinking about control and keeping costs of consumer staples. Otherwise, pay would not reach many people. Another thing is that they require all the security guarantees existing and to come, but we must also think that for sure, what is said there is nothing sure. Or can not burst a dam and razing several villages, as has happened? Do not pollute also power plants? Someone will say it is the same, but everything depends largely strict control is exercised.
What about the English plants? Spain Could an accident similar to Japan? I leave you with a report published by Consumer Eroski thereon, signed by Alex Fernandez Muerza. Click on this link
0 comments:
Post a Comment